This indicates Iranians’ strong will to defend their inalienable right to access nuclear technology meant for peaceful purposes, but can also be regarded as a symbolic measure on behalf of all
Due to their neocolonialist attitude, the
This neocolonialist attitude, which arose after World War II, considers the world’s independent countries, and particularly
Despite all their cultural, political, and religious differences with the
This idea was actually formed within the framework of these countries’ special conception of the international situation after World War II, but no such reasoning can govern the world today.
All of the countries in the world, and particularly those that have signed the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and declared their commitment to the regulations of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), believe that it is their inalienable right to gain access to civilian nuclear technology.
This technology has both technical and political dimensions.
The military application of this technology can actually threaten international security.
A good example of this is the Zionist regime, which, through its possession of nine military nuclear facilities and 250 nuclear warheads, not only threatens security in the Middle East but has also polluted the environment, since its nuclear installations were not constructed according to international standards.
Unfortunately, the double-standard policies of the
The fact that the
Also, within the framework of its strategic policy, the Islamic Republic of Iran has made two policy decisions on its nuclear activities. The first, upon which all Iranian officials are unanimous, is that possessing nuclear weapons cannot guarantee the country’s security, but, quite the contrary, would pose a serious threat to national security. In addition, maintaining a nuclear arsenal requires state-of-the-art technology and large expenditures, making it not at all cost-effective.
This is why
The second policy decision is that
During the past two years, the Islamic Republic of Iran has spared no effort to gain the confidence of the international community about the peaceful nature of its nuclear activities.
Two years of negotiations should have been sufficient for
Threatening to refer
SA/HG
End
MNA
Your Comment